Yes. Under 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government only needs to prove that a criminal agreement existed and that you knowingly joined it. Unlike general conspiracy law, federal drug conspiracy does not require an “overt act” — meaning you can be convicted even if no drugs were ever found on you or seized by police. This is what makes conspiracy charges particularly dangerous and why challenging knowledge and intent is so critical.

The safety valve under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) allows a judge to sentence below the mandatory minimum for first-time, non-violent drug offenders who meet specific criteria — including having minimal criminal history, not using violence, not being a leader, and fully debriefing the government. Qualifying for safety valve can be the difference between a mandatory 10 years and a sentence of 4-5 years. Attorney Cortez evaluates safety valve eligibility in every case from the start.

A 5K1.1 motion is filed by the government when a defendant provides substantial assistance in the prosecution of others. If granted, it allows the judge to sentence below the mandatory minimum — sometimes dramatically so. Cooperation is a complex strategic decision that must be carefully evaluated with experienced counsel. Providing assistance that is later deemed insufficient, or that creates new legal exposure, can make your situation worse rather than better.

Drug quantity is the single most important factor driving federal drug sentences. It determines whether mandatory minimums apply, and at what level. In a conspiracy case, you can be held responsible for all drugs handled by every co-conspirator — even drugs you never touched. Challenging the quantity attributed to you at sentencing is one of the most impactful things your attorney can do to reduce your actual sentence.

No — under Riley v. California, police must obtain a warrant to search your cell phone incident to arrest. However, if you consent to the search, that consent waives your Fourth Amendment protection. Never consent to a phone search. Cell phone data — texts, GPS pin drops, WhatsApp messages — is often the most damaging evidence in federal drug cases and is used to prove knowledge, intent, and participation in a conspiracy.

Federal sentencing distinguishes between “meth-actual” (the pure drug itself) and “meth-mixture” (the total weight including cutting agents). The penalties for meth-actual are triggered at lower weights — 5 grams of pure meth triggers the same 5-year minimum as 50 grams of mixture. Lab analysis of purity is therefore critically important and can be challenged if the government’s testing methodology was flawed.

Yes, but it is not automatic. In federal court there is no bail bondsman — you must convince a judge at a detention hearing that you are not a flight risk and not a danger to the community. Drug trafficking charges create a presumption in favor of detention that your attorney must overcome. Having experienced counsel at your detention hearing — ideally your first appearance — significantly improves your chances of pretrial release.

This is one of the most common situations in San Antonio drug cases involving I-35, I-10, and Hwy 90 traffic stops. The government must prove you had both knowledge of the drugs and control over them. When drugs are hidden in secret compartments — false fuel tanks, hidden panels, spare tires — the Fifth Circuit requires additional evidence beyond your mere presence in the vehicle to establish knowing possession. We fight hard for drivers who genuinely did not know about concealed drugs.

For federal transaction money laundering, the government must prove that you conducted or attempted a financial transaction, that the funds involved were proceeds of a specified unlawful activity, and that you knew the funds were criminal proceeds. Intent is also required — either to promote the unlawful activity or to conceal the nature or source of the funds. Attacking each of these elements is central to the defense.

Knowledge is a required element of federal money laundering — the government must prove you knew the funds represented criminal proceeds. However, federal prosecutors can argue “willful blindness” — that you deliberately avoided knowing the truth. Demonstrating a genuine lack of knowledge, or that you had no reason to suspect wrongdoing, is a critical defense strategy.

Federal agents frequently set up undercover operations where informants pose as drug traffickers or criminals seeking to launder money. If the government induced you to commit a crime you would not otherwise have committed, an entrapment defense may be available. We also scrutinize the conduct of the informant, any promises made, and whether the government’s tactics were so outrageous they violated due process.

Yes. Federal civil forfeiture law allows the government to seize assets it believes are connected to criminal activity — even before charges are filed and without a conviction. This can include bank accounts, vehicles, real estate, and cash. We can challenge improper seizures and work to recover legitimately owned assets through the forfeiture process.

Yes — structuring is a federal crime under 31 U.S.C. § 5324. It occurs when someone breaks up cash transactions specifically to stay below the $10,000 currency reporting threshold. Critically, the underlying money does not have to be from illegal activity — even structuring transactions involving perfectly legitimate funds is a federal felony if done with the intent to evade reporting requirements.

Texas has its own money laundering statute (Tex. Pen. Code § 34.02) with penalties based on the dollar amount involved. Federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1956 carry up to 20 years per count. In many cases, both state and federal prosecutors pursue charges simultaneously — each in their own court system. Having an attorney experienced in both venues is essential.

Yes — money laundering is considered an aggravated felony under federal immigration law. A conviction can result in deportation, permanent bars to re-entry, and denial of citizenship or legal status. Non-citizens facing money laundering charges must have an attorney who takes immigration consequences seriously from the very beginning of the case.

Federal money laundering investigations can span months or years before charges are filed. Agents may be reviewing bank records, monitoring transactions, developing informants, and building a comprehensive case long before you are aware of any investigation. If you have any reason to believe you are under investigation — including receiving a grand jury subpoena or a visit from federal agents — contact an attorney immediately.