Yes. Illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is a federal felony — not just a civil immigration violation. A first offense without prior criminal history carries up to 2 years, but prior felony or aggravated felony convictions can increase exposure to 10 or 20 years in federal prison. Federal sentencing guidelines govern the actual sentence, which an experienced attorney can work to reduce.

Yes — and one of the most powerful defenses is a collateral attack on the underlying deportation order. If the prior removal proceeding was fundamentally unfair or violated your due process rights, we can challenge whether the deportation was legally valid. This can result in the dismissal of the entire illegal reentry charge. Attorney Cortez evaluates this defense in every reentry case.

Statements made to federal agents — including Border Patrol, ICE, and HSI — can be charged as false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 or used as evidence in the underlying case. However, statements made before Miranda warnings were given, or after you requested an attorney, may be suppressible. We examine the full circumstances of every post-arrest statement.

Yes. You have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney before answering questions. At a Border Patrol checkpoint, you may be required to state your citizenship, but beyond that, you are not required to answer questions about your immigration status or activities. The safest thing you can do is politely decline to answer further questions and request an attorney.

Civil deportation (removal) is handled by immigration courts and results in being required to leave the country. Criminal immigration charges are federal crimes prosecuted in federal district court and can result in prison time on top of removal. Both proceedings can happen simultaneously — and a criminal conviction can make it far harder to ever obtain immigration relief in the future.

Border searches operate under different constitutional rules than interior searches. While basic manual phone searches have been permitted at the border without a warrant, forensic searches — downloading and analyzing phone contents — have faced more constitutional scrutiny. Do not consent to a phone search. Requiring agents to obtain a warrant preserves your rights and may result in evidence being suppressed.

Potentially yes. A federal criminal conviction can affect pending immigration applications for family members, disqualify you as a petitioner for family-based immigration, and in some cases trigger scrutiny of family members’ status. Attorney Cortez considers the full family immigration picture when advising on defense strategy and plea decisions.

Immediately. Federal initial appearance hearings — including bail hearings — happen within 24 to 72 hours of arrest. Having an attorney at the bail hearing significantly improves the chances of pretrial release. Evidence is also freshest immediately after arrest, and early intervention gives your attorney the most options. Call Attorney Cortez as soon as possible after any federal arrest.

Yes. Under 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government only needs to prove that a criminal agreement existed and that you knowingly joined it. Unlike general conspiracy law, federal drug conspiracy does not require an “overt act” — meaning you can be convicted even if no drugs were ever found on you or seized by police. This is what makes conspiracy charges particularly dangerous and why challenging knowledge and intent is so critical.

The safety valve under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) allows a judge to sentence below the mandatory minimum for first-time, non-violent drug offenders who meet specific criteria — including having minimal criminal history, not using violence, not being a leader, and fully debriefing the government. Qualifying for safety valve can be the difference between a mandatory 10 years and a sentence of 4-5 years. Attorney Cortez evaluates safety valve eligibility in every case from the start.

A 5K1.1 motion is filed by the government when a defendant provides substantial assistance in the prosecution of others. If granted, it allows the judge to sentence below the mandatory minimum — sometimes dramatically so. Cooperation is a complex strategic decision that must be carefully evaluated with experienced counsel. Providing assistance that is later deemed insufficient, or that creates new legal exposure, can make your situation worse rather than better.

Drug quantity is the single most important factor driving federal drug sentences. It determines whether mandatory minimums apply, and at what level. In a conspiracy case, you can be held responsible for all drugs handled by every co-conspirator — even drugs you never touched. Challenging the quantity attributed to you at sentencing is one of the most impactful things your attorney can do to reduce your actual sentence.

No — under Riley v. California, police must obtain a warrant to search your cell phone incident to arrest. However, if you consent to the search, that consent waives your Fourth Amendment protection. Never consent to a phone search. Cell phone data — texts, GPS pin drops, WhatsApp messages — is often the most damaging evidence in federal drug cases and is used to prove knowledge, intent, and participation in a conspiracy.

Federal sentencing distinguishes between “meth-actual” (the pure drug itself) and “meth-mixture” (the total weight including cutting agents). The penalties for meth-actual are triggered at lower weights — 5 grams of pure meth triggers the same 5-year minimum as 50 grams of mixture. Lab analysis of purity is therefore critically important and can be challenged if the government’s testing methodology was flawed.

Yes, but it is not automatic. In federal court there is no bail bondsman — you must convince a judge at a detention hearing that you are not a flight risk and not a danger to the community. Drug trafficking charges create a presumption in favor of detention that your attorney must overcome. Having experienced counsel at your detention hearing — ideally your first appearance — significantly improves your chances of pretrial release.

This is one of the most common situations in San Antonio drug cases involving I-35, I-10, and Hwy 90 traffic stops. The government must prove you had both knowledge of the drugs and control over them. When drugs are hidden in secret compartments — false fuel tanks, hidden panels, spare tires — the Fifth Circuit requires additional evidence beyond your mere presence in the vehicle to establish knowing possession. We fight hard for drivers who genuinely did not know about concealed drugs.