Miranda Rights Criminal Defense in San Antonio, Texas.
Police officers are good listeners. They want to hear what you have to say. That’s why they tell suspects, “we just want to hear your side of the story.” This approach seems fair. What could go wrong?
The short answer is everything. If you talk to police after an arrest, then you can make a bad case worse. The main reason is your own words will hurt you at trial. This because you are testifying against yourself.
As an example, your own words can place yourself at the scene of the crime. They can connect you to other suspects. Your words can also show you had the criminal intent to break the law. Worst of all, if you confess to the crime, then the State will likely have a slam-dunk case.
However, a suspect in this position has important rights. In particular, the Supreme Court requires police to warn suspects about talking without a lawyer before police ask any questions. These warnings are called Miranda rights. But this safeguard only goes so far.
In this post, we will describe what the Miranda rights are. When they apply. Most importantly, we will show you how to use the Miranda warnings to protect yourself from police overreach.
What are your Miranda Rights?
In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court created a new rule. This rule requires police to warn suspects about talking to police before the police can ask him or her any questions. If police ask a suspect questions without first giving this warning, then police cannot use the suspect’s statements in court.
At the same time, if police give a suspect the warning and the suspect agrees to talk to police, then whatever he says can be used against him in court. In effect, the Miranda script warns suspects that police think the person may have committed a crime. On top of that, the Miranda script gives a suspect the right to tap out of a criminal interrogation.
Moreover, the Miranda law protects people by giving them two important rights:
- The right to remain silent; and
- The right to have a lawyer present when police ask you questions about a crime.
This allows people to do two things. First, they can decide if they want to talk to police. And second, it allows a person to stop answering questions at any time.
However, this rule only applies when two things happen. First, the person must be in police custody. Second, police must ask the person questions. Together, these two events are called “custodial interrogation.” If both of these facts are present, then police must read you the Miranda script before they ask you any questions.
To summarize, Miranda stops police from giving people the “third degree” after an arrest. As a consequence, Miranda became a landmark case.
Right to Remain Silent vs Right to a Lawyer.
As mentioned above, Miranda created two rights. They are the right to remain silent and the right to speak with a lawyer. Still, these are two separate rights. Thus, asserting one right and not the other may lead to an unexpected outcome.
As an example, if a person only chooses to remain silent, then police must stop asking him questions. At this point, the person cuts off police questioning. Nonetheless, police are free to wait a couple of hours and then try and talk to him again. If during the second meeting the person confesses, then his statements can be used against him in court.
In contrast, if a person asks for a lawyer when he is being questioned by police, then police cannot ask him any more questions until the person has a lawyer present. This is a key point because it shows how these two rights are different. Asking to remain silent only pauses the interrogation. In contrast, asking for a lawyer stops any police questioning until you either talk to a lawyer or decide to speak without a lawyer.
In sum, these two rights are similar. They both require police to stop asking questions. But asking to remain silent only cuts off questioning for a short period of time. While asking for a lawyer stops all questioning until the person has a lawyer present. For this reason, always ask for a lawyer if you are in this position.
What is the Miranda Script?
If police conduct a custodial interrogation, then they must read the Miranda script below:
- You have the right to remain silent;
- Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law;
- You have a right to have a lawyer present during the police questioning; and
- If you cannot afford an attorney, then an attorney will be appointed for you before any questions are asked.
In short, these warnings are critical because they protect a suspect’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
What happens if Police do read you your Miranda warnings?
If police ask a person questions while he is in custody, then they must read him his Miranda rights. If police the person his Miranda rights, then police can ask the person questions unless the person asks for a lawyer or asserts his right to remain silent. Further, if you decide to talk to police after they read you the Miranda script, then whatever you say can be used against you at trial.
Can police question you without a lawyer?
Yes. Police can ask you questions without a lawyer in two scenarios. First, they can ask you questions if you give up your right to have a lawyer present during police questioning. Second, they can ask you questions if you are not in “police custody.”
More to the point, a person is in “police custody” if he or she is not free to walk away from police questioning. Therefore, if you answer police questions when you are free to walk away, then you are not in “police custody.” As a result, anything you say can be used against you at trial.
At the same time, the phrase “police custody” is a term of art because it turns on the facts of each case. Consequently, you should watch the body cam or dash cam videos of your arrest carefully to determine two key facts: (1) when were you in “police custody?;” and (2) when did police start asking you questions?
The answers to these two questions will tell you if can file a Motion to Suppress your statements based on a Miranda violation.
How do I invoke my Miranda rights?
Ask for a lawyer.
Remain Silent.
Does Texas have a Miranda law?
Yes. Miranda applies to Texas state cases. Also, Texas has a law that requires police to give suspects the following warnings:
| Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.22 | Texas Miranda Requirements |
|---|---|
| 38.22 Sec. 2 (a) (1) | Police must warn the suspect that he has the right to remain silent and not make any statement at all and that any statement he makes may be used against him at his trial; |
| 38.22 Sec. 2 (a) (2) | Any statement he makes may be used as evidence against him in court; |
| 38.22 Sec. 2 (a) (3) | He has the right to have a lawyer present to advise him prior to and during any questioning; |
| 38.22 Sec. 2 (a) (4) | If he is unable to employ a lawyer, he has the right to have a lawyer appointed to advise him prior to and during any questioning; |
| 38.22 Sec. 2 (a) (5) | He has the right to terminate the interview at any time; and |
| 38.22 Sec. 2 (b) | The accused, prior to and during the making of the statement, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the rights set out in the warning prescribed by Subsection (a) of this section. |
But if police want to use an oral or sign language statement, then they must record and preserve the statement for use at trial.
San Antonio Miranda Rights Criminal Defense.
Miranda protects our Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. It recognizes that police questioning at the jail house puts unfair pressure on suspects to admit guilt. In other words, police questioning can be so intense that it may cause a person to admit guilt against his own will. And this is what Miranda guards against.
Above all, if police do not honor your Miranda rights, then your statements cannot be used at your trial. This applies to even serious cases like drug, gun, or human smuggling crimes. And that’s the key point of Miranda. It gives the suspect control on when or if to answer police questions.
San Antonio Attorney Genaro R. Cortez.
Phone: 210-733-7575